bounce message | bounced message | bounce e-mail | bounced e-mail | bounce mail | bounced mail | bounce e-mail message | bounced e-mail message | returned e-mail | returned message | returned mail | barf e-mail | barfmail

analysis of the mail [ mail-return studies | mail-return study ]

accounting rate of return | rate of return on capital employed

response rate | return rate

mail return

undeliverable mail returned

accounting rate of return | accounting return | ARR | average accounting return

risk-adjusted target rate of return | risk-adjusted target return | risk-adjusted return target

A total of 1,629 officers responded to the survey, yielding a response rate of 70.5%, which is a highly acceptable return rate for a mail survey.

(a) where the mail was posted in Australia, Great Britain (including Northern Ireland), the Republic of Ireland, Mexico or the United States with postage thereon paid at the current rate of postage for letters in that country and where the mail bears a return address, with or without a request for return, the mail shall be returned directly to the sender;

(b) subject to subsection (1.1), where the mail was posted in a country other than a country mentioned in paragraph (a) with postage thereon paid at the current rate of postage for letters in that country, whether or not the mail bears a return address or request for return, the mail shall be returned to an office of exchange of the country of origin; and

(Return tabled) Question No. 507 Mr. Todd Russell: With regard to the government’s May 21, 2010 announcement concerning Nutrition North Canada: (a) has Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) completed any studies providing evidence that delivery of the subsidy through retailers rather than Canada Post will be more cost-effective and efficient and, if so, (i) how was this shown, (ii) on what dates were the studies completed, (iii) what are the titles of these studies, (iv) what are the names, positions and qualifications held by the authors; (b) has INAC completed any stud ...[+++]ies providing evidence that delivery of the subsidy through retailers will make healthy food more accessible and affordable in isolated Northern communities and, if so, (i) how was this shown, (ii) on what dates were the studies completed, (iii) what are the titles of these studies, (iv) what are the names, positions and qualifications held by the authors; (c) has INAC completed any analyses of the effect of proposed program cost-containment measures on the price of healthy food and on food security in isolated Northern communities and, if so, (i) what did they show, (ii) on what dates were the studies completed, (iii) what are the titles of these studies, (iv) what are the names, positions and qualifications held by the authors; (d) has INAC completed any analyses of the impact on demand and therefore on program expenditures of Health Canada activities under Nutrition North Canada to promote the consumption of healthy food in isolated Northern communities and, if so, (i) what did they show, (ii) on what dates were the studies completed, (iii) what are the titles of these studies, (iv) what are the names, positions and qualifications held by the authors; (e) has INAC completed any analyses of the impact on food prices and food security in isolated Northern communities resulting from the removal on October 3, 2010 of most non-perishable food from eligibility for the Food Mail Program in isolat ...