Could the member explain to us and Canadians how it is that her party feels that it is acceptable to bypass judicial due process in revoking citizenship?

3. The debtor and the creditor may, on the ground that they have agreed to settle the claim, apply jointly to the court that issued the Preservation Order for revocation or modification of the Order or to the competent court of the Member State of enforcement or, where national law so provides, to the competent enforcement authority in that Member State, for termination or limitation of the enforcement of the Order.

11. Regrets that these laws are already used to arrest and fine citizens, including heterosexual citizens, who express support, tolerance or acceptance to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people; also regrets that these laws legitimate homophobia and sometimes violence, as was the case in the violent attack of a bus carrying LGBT activists on 17 May 2012 in Saint Petersburg; or two gay pride leaders being beaten up on 20 May 2012 in Kiev, resulting in cancelling the pride; condemns the violence and threats surrounding the Kiev Pride on 20 May; recalls that for visa liberalisation, Ukraine is bound to introduce anti-discriminati ...[+++]on legislation including sexual orientation; is of the opinion that the current developments in Ukraine, the proposed draft laws against ‘spreading homosexuality’ and the incidents surrounding the Kiev Pride, are in contradiction to this; calls upon the Ukrainian authorities to immediately revoke the draft laws, to propose anti-discrimination legislation including sexual orientation and to commit to making a safe Kiev Pride possible next year;

13. Notes that a number of questions still need to be addressed, including the selection of what are termed 'UPR Troikas' which will facilitate review of the UN Member States in the field of human rights; in this regard, urges EU Member States not to accept the possibility of the confidential refusal by countries under review of the selection of countries in charge of their review;

13. Notes that a number of questions still need to be addressed, including the selection of what are termed 'UPR Troikas' which will facilitate review of the UN Member States in the field of human rights; in this regard, urges EU Member States not to accept the possibility for countries under review to confidentially refuse the selection of countries in charge of their review;

1. Without prejudice to Article 46, Member States shall ensure that the payment service user may not revoke a payment order after the time of its acceptance by the payer's payment service provider for payments initiated by the payer or by the payee's payment service provider for payments initiated by or through the payee.