· Reference to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: A controversial recital referring to UNCLOS was deleted, as both Parliament and the Commission felt this would weaken the Regulation.

It must be possible for rightholders to pursue infringements of intellectual property rights regardless of the means by which those rights are infringed or the form of the infringing material.

The compromise on the two contentious issues, namely time allowed for setting limits and the right to return contaminated feed to the country of origin with the consent of that country's government, was realistic and workable.

29. Considers that, within the TEP framework, the function of anti-dumping measures and countervailing duties designed to offset subsidies in Transatlantic trade should be re-examined as soon as possible and that the TABD could make a useful contribution to this process; stresses that discussion in Transatlantic fora should gradually move towards dealing also with the more contentious issues;

Where it is alleged, in a case governed by Article 10 of Directive 92/50, that a contract should have been awarded in accordance with the provisions of Titles III to VI of that Directive, it must be demonstrated to the national court, on the basis of the information which was or should have been considered by the contracting authority, and taking into account that authority's margin of appreciation, that the value of the service listed in Annex I A to that Directive which constitutes part of the services contracted for in the disputed contract should have been estimated by the contracting authority to be greater than that of the constitu ...[+++]ent service listed in Annex I B. (3) Subject to an assessment, in an appropriate concrete case, of whether the relevant provisions of Titles III to VI of Directive 92/50 create rights for individuals which are unconditional and sufficiently precise to be enforceable in the absence of national implementing measures, the right of service providers under Articles 1 to 10 of Directive 92/50, taken together, to participate in the award of public service contracts in accordance with the provisions of that Directive is capable of direct effect.

By its first and second questions, the Højesteret is asking in substance whether Article 2(1) of the regulation in issue, which was applicable at the time of the facts in the main proceedings, is to be construed as meaning that, where a post-clearance inspection has revealed an error in the tariff classification of goods indicated in a declaration for release into free circulation, and where the levying of customs duties on products covered by the heading under which those goods ought to have been classified was suspended at the date on which that declaration was accepted but had been re-established when the error was detected, the factu ...[+++]al and legal situation to be taken into account by the customs authorities in order to recalculate the amount of customs duty legally due is that prevailing when the declaration was accepted or when the error in tariff classification was discovered.