The measures adopted by the EU and the Member State governments in the context of the anti-labour decisions taken at the informal EU employment summit of 7 May 2009 in Prague constitute a harsh attack on workers with the aim of safeguarding the profits made by monopolies.

The measures adopted by the EU and the Member State governments in the context of the anti-labour decisions taken at the informal EU employment summit of 7 May 2009 in Prague constitute a harsh attack on workers with the aim of safeguarding the profits made by monopolies.

For example, they have replied to unanswered letters, made payments that are due and reversed previous unfavourable decisions.

There was an unfavourable decision made about managing groundfish stocks, and about the catch plan, that was supposed to promote conservation of the resource.

In the hands of a judicial court system, which is largely biased against fathers in this area, where traditionally fathers have been excluded, you can expect to see increasing amounts of bias and an increasing number of fathers being driven out of the lives of their children.

Judicial review of a negative citizenship decision is limited, by section 18.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, to instances where the decision-maker: a) acted without jurisdiction, acted beyond its jurisdiction or refused to exercise its jurisdiction; b) failed to observe a principle of natural justice, procedural fairness or other procedure that it was required by law to observe; c) erred in law in making a decision or an order, whether or not the error appears on the face of the record; d) based its decision or order on an erroneous finding of fact that it made in a perverse or capricious manner or without regard for the material befo ...[+++]re it; e) acted, or failed to act, by reason of fraud or perjured evidence; or f) acted in any other way that was contrary to law.