Second, there needs to be discussion and parliamentary consideration of the much broader issue, that being whether Canada needs a system that goes further than the current SIN, a system that's not a file identifier but rather a personal identifier.

321. Recalls Parliament's constant demands for a reduction of the administrative burden, in particular in grants procedures ; deplores the fact that the time to contract averages 13 months, representing an increase of four months compared to the FP5; with a view to the FP7, demands that the Commission make use of existing administrative tools (e.g. Personal Identification Codes (PICs) and Legal Entity Appointed Representatives (LEARs));

319. Recalls Parliament's constant demands for a reduction of the administrative burden, in particular in grants procedures; deplores the fact that the time to contract averages 13 months, representing an increase of four months compared to the FP5; with a view to the FP7, demands that the Commission make use of existing administrative tools (e.g. Personal Identification Codes (PICs) and Legal Entity Appointed Representatives (LEARs));

16. Notes that the Agency's technical staff members need to be commonly recruited from national aviation authorities and the aviation industry; understands that the staff members must have sufficient and up-to-date technical experience of working in the field of aviation to perform a technical check of documents demonstrating compliance for the purposes of ensuring an adequate level of aviation safety as requested by the applicable Union legislation; is concerned however that this situation could cause conflicts of interest if a staff member recruited from an aircraft manufacturer works and takes decisions at the Agency on the certification of the aircraft he/she used to work on while employed by the manufacturer and, if not detected and ...[+++]adequately managed, could result in a conflict of interest situation; recognises however that the Agency has put in place a certification procedure where impartiality of the decision-making process is guaranteed through the collegiality of the technical assessments and the decision-making process itself; also understands that the Agency is in the process of setting up an Agency-wide policy in the area of codes of conduct including identification, prevention, monitoring and dealing with the consequences of potential conflict of interest cases which will help the Agency to further improve the identification and handling of conflict of interests situations in such a way that aviation safety is not put at risk at any time;

(21a) In the case of unauthorised use of verification instruments, the following behaviour should inter alia be considered as gross negligence: the fact that the holder noted his personal identification number or any other code in an easily recognisable form, and particularly on the electronic funds transfer instrument or on an object or document kept or carried by the holder with the instrument, as well as the fact that the holder did not notify the issuer that the instrument had been lost or stolen as soon as he became aware of that fact.

- the noting by the holder of his personal identification number or any other code in an easily recognisable form, in particular on the electronic funds transfer instrument or on an object or document kept or carried by the holder with the instrument, and