Fifthly, the Civil Service Tribunal held, in consequence of the existence of those special circumstances, that although the communication to the applicant of the individual eliminatory mark, of 24.5 out of 50, which he received in the oral test constitutes more than merely the initial elements of a statement of reasons which, according to the case-law (Case T‑71/96 Berlingieri Vinzek v Commission [1997] ECR-SC I‑A‑339 and II‑921, paragraph 79), was susceptible of being supplemented by further information provided during the proceedings, that mark alone not being sufficient, in the particular circumstances, to satisfy fully the obligation ...[+++] to state reasons.

Martin, let us not forget, this is not a penalty shootout, but a penalty awarded mid-game!

Thus, in choosing to ask a candidate to attend at the start of the first interpretation test, which precedes the general oral test, in order to put him at ease, the selection board does not fail to observe the limits of that discretion.

At the beginning of the 20 century, however, women were admitted to a number of events, including golf, tennis, archery, sailing and skating.

This Convention shall apply to the transport of goods without intermediate reloading, in road vehicles, combinations of vehicles or in containers, across one or more frontiers between a customs office of departure of one Contracting Party and a customs office of destination of another or of the same Contracting Party, provided that some portion of the journey between the beginning and the end of the TIR operation is made by road.

the term ‘start of a TIR operation’ shall mean that the road vehicle, the combination of vehicles or the container have been presented for purposes of control to the Customs office of departure or entry (en route) together with the load and the TIR Carnet relating thereto and that the TIR Carnet has been accepted by the Customs office;