last approach azimuth data base word

first back azimuth data base word

11. Advocates a risk-based approach; supports the approach of reducing the number of controls in Member States where the error rate or the level of non-compliance has been extremely low over a given period; recalls that advice on best practice and controls must be stepped up in Member States where the error rate or the level of non-compliance is high or increasing, although there should be a margin of tolerance in the first year ...[+++]of implementing complex new measures under the most recent CAP reform; urges, in addition, that where minor or inadvertent errors have occurred the penalties should be proportionate;

(Return tabled) Question No. 333 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to the government’s consultations about prostitution-related offences: (a) what goals have been established for the consultations; (b) what goals have been established for the online consultation; (c) whose input did the government seek through online consultation; (d) which individuals wrote the discussion paper for the online consultation; (e) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the discussion paper in ...[+++] (d); (f) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (g) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (h) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (i) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the discussion paper in (d); (j) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the discussion paper in (d); (k) which individuals developed the online consultation questions; (l) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (m) which individuals with expertise in prostitution-related offences reviewed the online consultation questions; (n) which individuals with legal expertise participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (o) which individuals with legal expertise reviewed the online consultation questions; (p) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics participated in the development of the online consultation questions; (q) what experts in survey methodology, research methods, or statistics reviewed the online consultation questions; (r) how many responses did the government receive through the online form; (s) how many responses were sent directly to ...

11. Deplores the Council Presidency’s reluctance to participate in the interinstitutional political meeting on payments proposed by Parliament as a follow-up to last year's budgetary conciliation; regards this behaviour as an irresponsible attempt to ignore the lack of payments issue and the question of RAL; considers such a meeting the ideal platform for the two arms of the budgetary authority to reach a common understanding - ahead of their respective positions on the draft budget - regarding the available data on implementation and absorption capacity and to correctly estimate the payment needs for 2012 and 2013; recalls that the payment appropriations proposed by the Commission in its draft budget are ...[+++]based on the estimates made by the Member States themselves; firmly believes, therefore, that any doubts or second thoughts - as expressed by some Council delegations - over the Commission's figures and calculations need to be communicated, examined and clarified as soon as possible, in order not to become an impediment to reaching an agreement in this year's conciliation;

10. Deplores the Council Presidency’s reluctance to participate in the interinstitutional political meeting on payments proposed by Parliament as a follow-up to last year's budgetary conciliation; regards this behaviour as an irresponsible attempt to ignore the lack of payments issue and the question of RAL; considers such a meeting the ideal platform for the two arms of the budgetary authority to reach a common understanding - ahead of their respective positions on the draft budget - regarding the available data on implementation and absorption capacity and to correctly estimate the payment needs for 2012 and 2013; recalls that the payment appropriations proposed by the Commission in its draft budget are ...[+++]based on the estimates made by the Member States themselves; firmly believes, therefore, that any doubts or second thoughts - as expressed by some Council delegations - over the Commission's figures and calculations need to be communicated, examined and clarified as soon as possible, in order not to become an impediment to reaching an agreement in this year's conciliation;