Paragraph 2(3)(c) of the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act is replaced by the following: (c) any real property or immovable developed and used as a park and situated within an area defined as " urban" by Statistics Canada, as of the most recent census of the population of Canada taken by Statistics Canada, other than national parks of Canada, national marine parks of Canada, national park reserves of Canada, national marine park reserves of Canada, national historic sites of Canada, national battlefields or heritage canals; (3) Subsection (2) comes into force on the day on which section 56 of this Act comes into force (4) If it is not in f ...[+++]orce when section 56 of this Act comes into force, paragraph 2(3)(c) of the Municipal Grants Act as enacted by subsection 3(6) of the other Act is replaced by the following: (c) any real property or immovable developed and used as a park and situated within an area defined as " urban" by Statistics Canada, as of the most recent census of the population of Canada taken by Statistics Canada, other than national parks of Canada, national marine parks of Canada, national park reserves of Canada, national marine park reserves of Canada, national historic sites of Canada, national battlefields or heritage canals; (5) Subsection (4) comes into force on the later of the day on which section 56 of this Act comes into force and the day on which the other Act comes into force.

First, Dr. Pearse's report explicitly states that compensation will be a last resort because, first, the SARA promotes the use of voluntary measures to protect and recover species at risk; second, the provinces will be the first jurisdiction that will be confronted with and be asked to resolve a potential land-use conflict; third, the federal government will likely first try to use other legal tools that don't trigger compensation, such as the Fisheries Act; fourth, compensation comes into play if, and only if, the federal safety net is invoked because other means were not applied or were not effective; and lastly, the difficult poli ...[+++]tical situation that would result from the federal government stepping into areas of clear provincial jurisdiction will stimulate innovative agreements between the two levels of government and will limit the use of the safety net.

So farmers—and it's been documented—have acknowledged that it was an agronomic advantage to them to have GM canola in their farming systems, so much so that canola went from being a crop that you grew in your cleanest fields to being a crop that you could grow to help to clean up fields with respect to weeds.

for securitised facilities subject to the early amortisation treatment, the aggregate drawn exposures attributed to the originator’s and investors’ interests respectively, the aggregate capital requirements incurred by the credit institution against the originator’s interest and the aggregate capital requirements incurred by the credit institution against the investor’s shares of drawn balances and undrawn lines;

Box 3: A horizontal approach to the regulation of selling practices Scope Consistent conduct of business, inducements and conflict of interest provisions, with MiFID as the benchmark, would be applied to all those selling packaged retail investment products, irrespective of whether the entity is an intermediary or the product manufacturer themselves.

Scope The new horizontal instrument would be applicable to all manufacturers of packaged retail investment products. This would be irrespective of whether the product is a re-manufactured form of another underlying product, as where product wrappers are in use.