EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 32014D0401 - EN - Council Decision 2014/401/CFSP of 26 June 2014 on the European Union Satellite Centre and repealing Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP on the establishment of a European Union Satellite Centre // COUNCIL DECISION 2014/401/CFSP // PROVISIONS ON THE ASSOCIATION OF THIRD STATES WITH SATCEN'S ACTIVITIES

EUROPA - EU law and publications - EUR-Lex - EUR-Lex - 62009CA0236 - EN - Case C-236/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium)) — Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Yann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Fundamental rights — Combating discrimination — Equal treatment for men and women — Access to and supply of goods and services — Insurance premiums and benefits — Actuarial factors — Sex as a factor in the assessment of insurance risks — Private life assurance contracts — ...[+++] Directive 2004/113/EC — Article 5(2) — Derogation not subject to any temporal limitation — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 21 and 23 — Invalidity) // Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 1 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium)) — Association Belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Yann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres // (Case C-236/09) - ( // (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fundamental rights - Combating discrimination - Equal treatment for men and women - Access to and supply of goods and services - Insurance premiums and benefits - Actuarial factors - Sex as a factor in the assessment of insurance risks - Private life assurance contracts - Directive 2004/113/EC - Article 5(2) - Derogation not subject to any temporal limitation - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 23 - Invalidity)

Given the legal framework, none of the bidders for Austrian Airlines questioned that the headquarters should remain in Austria and this fact was therefore taken into account accordingly in the acquisition concepts and had no influence on the purchase price.

On this basis, the Commission can conclude that neither the requirement to maintain the headquarters in Austria nor the requirement to retain an Austrian core shareholder structure was liable to lower the purchase price or to deter potential investors from submitting a bid, so no loss of State resources was involved.

2. If delivery is made to an approved purchasing centre as provided for in Article 171ck(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004, unprocessed tobacco, once checked, may leave the purchasing centre solely for the purpose of being transferred to the processing plant.

Whereas with the object of organisation buying-in by intervention agencies in an efficient manner, criteria should be laid down for selecting intervention centres for buying-in ; whereas the choice of such centres should be determined by certain technical requirements ensuring satisfactory cold-storage of the meat;