M. whereas an approach towards adaptation mechanisms which is based solely on a cost-benefit analysis does not seem appropriate, as it is foreseeable that in Europe too the poorest will be hardest hit, because they generally lack sufficient insurance, information and mobility to respond to a changing environment,

M. whereas an approach towards adaptation mechanisms which is based solely on a cost-benefit analysis does not seem appropriate, as it is foreseeable that in Europe too the poorest will be hardest hit, because they generally lack sufficient insurance, information and mobility to respond to a changing environment,

In support of that analysis, the appellant relies on Article 142a(2) of Regulation No 40/94, introduced by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic to the European Union and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded (OJ 2003 L 236, p. 33) (‘the Act of Accession’), which provides: ‘[t]he registration of a Community trade mark which is under application at the date ...[+++]of accession may not be refused on the basis of any of the absolute grounds for refusal listed in Article 7(1) [of Regulation No 40/94], if these grounds became applicable merely because of the accession of a new Member State’.

4. Calls on the Commission to bring forward as soon as possible a draft long-term horizontal strategy which would allow substitution policies, based on a comparative analysis of alternative products throughout their lifecycle, to be introduced for various categories of products including, in particular, products directly linked to human health, disposable products and products that are difficult to separate;

The aim of checking a sample of underlying transactions is to confirm, or invalidate, the conclusions of the system analysis and to provide a justified evaluation of the capacity of the system inspected to comply with Community rules on collecting own resources, or with regard to the anti-fraud aspect.

1.4. control: the objective of this function is to verify the facts on which applications and claims are based in order to review their compliance with the financing agreement rules and the terms and conditions of the commitment. this control shall, where appropriate, include pre-project selection checks, remeasurement, checks on quantity and quality of goods or services delivered, an analysis or a sample control, pre-payment checks and any special provisions mentioned in the financing agreement rules as to the eligibility of the expe ...[+++]nditure etc.