judicial proceedings [ court proceedings | discontinuance of judicial proceedings | end of judicial proceedings | judicial procedure | legal procedure | legal proceedings | withdrawal of judicial proceedings | Judicial procedure(ECLAS) | procedure (law)(UNBIS) ]

jurisdictional | judicial and quasi-judicial | judicial or quasi-judicial | judicial

judicial cooperation [ mutual assistance in legal matters | judicial assistance(GEMET) ]

conventional water barrier | non-triggered water barrier | perated barrier | self-operated barrier | self-operating barrier

judicial claim | judicial redress | judicial remedy | recourse to judicial review | remedy before a court or tribunal

blood-testis barrier | blood testis barrier | blood-testes barrier | testis-blood barrier | hemato-testicular barrier

blood-brain barrier | BBB | blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier | BCB | blood-cerebral barrier | blood-cortical barrier | blood-spinal fluid barrier | Held's limiting membrane

impervious barrier [ impervious confinement barrier | tight barrier | tight containment barrier | tight isolation barrier ]

trade restriction [ obstacle to trade | restriction on trade | trade barrier ]

There is no doubt in my mind, I say unequivocally, that the charter of rights has set up many barriers to accomplishing good judicial answers in the country.

Mr. Garth Barrière: My understanding from reading the transcripts of previous appearances before this committee is that the Honourable Lawrence MacAulay talked about the principle of judicial review, and yet what we're talking about here is the removal of the principle of judicial review.

(Return tabled) Question No. 4 Hon. Irwin Cotler: With regard to international treaties and conventions dealing in whole or in part with human rights and with Canada’s international obligations in this regard: (a) does the government have any formal or informal procedures for regular review of those international human rights treaties that Canada has not yet signed, ratified, or otherwise accepted; (b) does the government have any formal or informal guidelines according to which it determines whether the specific obligations contained in a treaty or other international undertaking conflicts with the Constitution Act, 1867, and if so where can these guidelines be accessed; (c) do the guidelines referred to in (b) specify the standard accor ...[+++]ding to which the government determines if any obligation contained in a treaty or other international undertaking violates any section of the Constitution Act, 1867; (d) has the government engaged in any review of its obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD); (e) does the government have any formal or informal guidelines according to which it determines whether the specific obligations contained in a treaty or other international undertaking require implementing legislation in order for Canada to be able to ratify or otherwise accept it, and if so where can these guidelines be accessed; (f) does the government have a position as to whether international agreements that establish a complaints mechanism or communications procedure for enforcement of the rights and obligations contained therein are necessarily unconstitutional; (g) does the government have a policy as to whether Canada will accept such agreements referred to in (f); (h) does the government undergo review of proposed international human rights agreements that would establish such a mechanism or procedure referred to in (f) on a case by case basis, (i) who is involved in this review, (ii) are the provinces and other inte ...

A general programme in the field of civil justice aimed at better mutual understanding of the legal and judicial systems of the Member States will contribute to lowering the barriers to judicial cooperation in civil matters, which will improve the functioning of the internal market.