6. Notes with concern that as in its previous reports, the Court of Auditors has noted the need to introduce a system of remuneration for services provided by Member States authorities, based on their real costs; regrets that no progress has been made on this issue since 2009, when a proposal for a new payment system was presented to the Management Board but no agreement was reached; notes that the Agency will present a new proposal for a new payment system to the Management Board in March 2013; acknowledges the efforts made by the Agency's executives to encourage a decision by the Management Board to revise the system of remuneration of Member States services based on real costs; is fully aware of the fact that the little progress made ...[+++] is due to the lack of decision taken by the Management Board; welcomes, therefore, the approach by the Agency's administration to call upon the Commission for further assistance in this matter; urges the Agency to inform the discharge authority about the developments on this issue, inter alia on the state of play as regards the new action plan and the Management Board's position on it;

3(a) tThe cost to be shared among airspace users shall be the determined cost of providing air navigation services, including appropriate amounts for interest on capital investment and depreciation of assets, as well as the costs of maintenance, operation, management and administration, ð including the costs incurred by EAA for relevant authority tasks ï.

7. Finds it unacceptable that while the Management Board of the Authority consists of only 15 members, each meeting costs on average EUR 92 630, which represents an amount of EUR 6 175 per member; underlines that this amount is nearly three times higher than the second most expensive Management Board of a decentralised agency; is of the opinion that the Management Board meetings costs are excessive and should be reduced drastically; calls on the Authority and its Management Board to remedy the situation immediately and to inform the discharge authority of the measures undertaken by 30 June 2012;

84. Believes that Parliament's building policy requires careful analysis and that the administration should continue to develop buildings policy in cooperation with the Committee on Budgets; requests therefore to be kept informed on a regular basis on new developments for building projects with a significant financial implications for the budget, such as e.g. the Konrad Adenauer building, the House of European History and building/acquisition projects at Parliament's places of work; asks to be kept informed about the creation of any new posts relating to DG INLO's three-year plan before they are approved by the administration; asks th ...[+++]e administration to establish a service agreement for cost sharing with the Commission of the running costs and any other institution that may wish to use the facilities of the House of European History; calls upon the EU institutions to better coordinate their visitors' programs with a view to exploiting synergies, increasing visitor satisfaction and sharing cost; asks the Administration to improve the governance of interinstitutional projects;

80. Believes that the Parliament's building policy requires careful analysis and that the administration should continue to develop buildings policy in cooperation with the committee on Budgets; requests therefore to be kept informed on a regular basis on new developments for building projects with a significant financial implications for the budget, such as e.g. the KAD building; the House of European History and building/acquisition projects at the Parliament's places of work; asks to be kept informed about the creation of any new posts relating to DG INLO's three year plan before they are approved by the administration; asks the a ...[+++]dministration to establish a service agreement for cost sharing with the Commission of the running costs and any other institution that may wish to use the facilities of the House of European History; calls upon the European institutions to better coordinate their visitors' programs with a view to exploiting synergies, increasing visitor satisfaction and sharing cost; asks the Administration to improve the governance of interinstitutional projects;

Financial costs: direct costs embracing the costs of supply and administration, operation and maintenance, and also capital costs.