280. Considers that the Public Health Programme (PHP) (2003-2007) was ambitiously set, but that its objectives were neither clear enough nor adjusted to the limited budgetary means; points out that this led to the programme having too many action areas, which in some cases were not even covered by projects; notes that this dilution has decreased the quality of the programme, at the same time as making the range of projects so wide that the Commission is not fully aware of all existing projects; therefore invites the Commission to report to Parliament on th ...[+++]e outcome of its mapping exercises for the current PHP and stresses that the risk of dilution should be addressed in the mid-term and ex-post evaluations of the programme;

(b)the possible impact of the proposed merger on unit-holders, including but not limited to any material differences in respect of investment policy and strategy, costs, expected outcome, periodic reporting, possible dilution in performance, and, where relevant, a prominent warning to investors that their tax treatment may be changed following the merger.

the possible impact of the proposed merger on unit-holders, including but not limited to any material differences in respect of investment policy and strategy, costs, expected outcome, periodic reporting, possible dilution in performance, and, where relevant, a prominent warning to investors that their tax treatment may be changed following the merger.

where G EDFW ,i = instantaneous equivalent diluted exhaust mass flow rate (kg/s) G EXHW ,i = instantaneous exhaust mass flow rate (kg/s) q i = instantaneous dilution ratio G TOTW ,I = instantaneous diluted exhaust mass flow rate through dilution tunnel (kg/s) G DILW ,i = instantaneous dilution air mass flow rate (kg/s) f = data sampling rate (Hz) n = number of measurements (b) where M f = particulate mass sampled over the cycle (mg) r s = average sample ratio over the test cycle where where M SE = sampled exhaust mass over the cycle (kg) M EXHW = total exhaust mass flow over the cycle (kg) M SAM = mass of diluted exhaust gas passing the ...[+++]particulate collection filters (kg) M TOTW = mass of diluted exhaust gas passing the dilution tunnel (kg) NOTE: In case of the total sampling type system, M SAM and M TOTW are identical.

These are major dilutions of the Holtmann report.

This bill is, however, nothing but a watered-down version of the red book commitment to implement the June 1993 report of the Standing Committee on Consumer and Corporate Affairs and Government Operations respecting the review of the Lobbyists Registration Act.