Are you saying that if a DNA sample has been contaminated it could yield erroneous identification of another person, or would it just give you an erroneous analysis or profile that won't match up with anybody?

When such finger-position identification is not possible or it proves to be erroneous, national systems may request verifications in CS-VIS involving the use of ‘permutations’.

When such finger-position identification is not possible or it proves to be erroneous, national systems may request verifications in CS-VIS involving the use of ‘permutations’

Question No. 109 Mr. Peter Stoffer: Of the approximately 7000 individuals who have been refused gun licenses: (a) how many are due to errors in license form processing; (b) how many are due to multiple, failed attempts by the same person; (c) how many are due to the false flagging of individuals through mistaken identity or improper entry in the Firearms Interest Police database; (d) how many refusals subsequently resulted in the issue of a license; (e) how many individuals have been legitimately refused and how many of these lied on their application in order to apply; and (f) how many of those who have been denied a license have b ...[+++]een prosecuted for making false statements on their applications?

Most of the causes of wrongful conviction have been covered by the mistaken eyewitness's identification, material non-disclosure, recanting witnesses, jailhouse informants, junk science, that kind of thing.

Ms. Stoddart goes on to say that " Strict authentication measures of individuals designated by written notices would be necessary to ensure there would be no instances of misidentification" .