(14) In order to achieve the objectives of Regulation (EC) No 111/2005, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in order to lay down provisions determining cases where a licence is not required and to set out further conditions for granting licences, to establish the conditions for exemptions from the controls of certain categories of operators and of operators engaged in the export of small quantities of scheduled substances listed in Category 3, to establish the criteria to determine how the licit purposes of the transaction may be demonstrated ...[+++], to determine the information that is required by the competent authorities to monitor export, import or intermediary activities of operators, to determine the countries of destination to which exports of scheduled substances of Category 2 and 3 of the Annex should be preceded by a pre-export notification, to determine simplified pre-export procedures and to establish the common criteria thereof, to determine the countries of destination to which exports of scheduled substances listed in Category 3 of the Annex should be subject to an export authorisation, to determine simplified export authorisation procedures and to establish the common criteria thereof, and to introduce additional substances into the Annex to this Regulation, as well as other amendments necessary to respond to new trends of drug precursor diversion.

This mechanism means that, when a Member State is planning to grant an export licence which has been previously denied by another Member State for an essentially identical transaction, it must consult this Member State and notify all Member States of its final decision.

You have explained the type of cases where consultation takes place and this obviously only happens when an identical application from a state has been rejected and another state intends to authorise an export application.

17. Urges the Commission to come forward with a proposal to insert into the Regulation as soon as practicable a prohibition on the brokering of transactions by any European Union natural or legal person from any place involving international transfers that aims at funding trade in tools of torture, including sales and exports of items with no practical use other than for capital punishment, torture or other ill-treatment, as included in Annex II of the Regulation, and requiring Member States to introduce effective mechanisms to contro ...[+++]l the brokering of transactions involving transfers of any items listed in Annex III of the Regulation;

11. Subject to the relevant provisions governing fair comparison, the existence of margins of dumping during the investigation period shall normally be established on the basis of a comparison of a weighted average normal value with a weighted average of prices of all export transactions to the Community, or by a comparison of individual normal values and individual export prices to the Community on a transaction-to-transaction basis.

avoidance of selective export transactions for launching an investigation without recourse to all export practices and transactions;