- I have been advised that the precedent is as follows: where there is an oral amendment to an oral amendment, if the first person who tabled the oral amendment accepts the second oral amendment as a consensus, it is taken into account.
- La jurisprudence, me dit-on, est la suivante: quand il y a un amendement oral sur un amendement oral, si le premier qui a déposé le premier amendement oral accepte le deuxième amendement oral comme un consensus, on le prend en compte.