document information | document reference | document reference information | reference | reference information

documentation centre | documentation center | information centre | information center

document reference information [ document reference | document information | reference information | reference ]

information and documentation agency | information and documentation unit

Definition: This block contains a wide variety of disorders that differ in severity and clinical form but that are all attributable to the use of one or more psychoactive substances, which may or may not have been medically prescribed. The third character of the code identifies the substance involved, and the fourth character specifies the clinical state. The codes should be used, as required, for each substance specified, but it should be noted that not all fourth character codes are applicable to all substances. Identification of the psychoactive substance should be based on as many sources of information as possible. These include sel ...[+++]f-report data, analysis of blood and other body fluids, characteristic physical and psychological symptoms, clinical signs and behaviour, and other evidence such as a drug being in the patient's possession or reports from informed third parties. Many drug users take more than one type of psychoactive substance. The main diagnosis should be classified, whenever possible, according to the substance or class of substances that has caused or contributed most to the presenting clinical syndrome. Other diagnoses should be coded when other psychoactive substances have been taken in intoxicating amounts (common fourth character .0) or to the extent of causing harm (common fourth character .1), dependence (common fourth character .2) or other disorders (common fourth character .3-.9). Only in cases in which patterns of psychoactive substance-taking are chaotic and indiscriminate, or in which the contributions of different psychoactive substances are inextricably mixed, should the diagnosis of disorders resulting from multiple drug use (F19.-) be used. | Modifiers The following fourth-character subdivisions are for use with categories F10-F19: Code Title .0 Acute intoxication A condition that follows the administration of a psychoactive substance resulting in disturbances in level of consciousness, cognition, perception, affect or behaviour, o ...

Association des professionnels de l'information et de la documentation [ Association of Information and Documentation Professionals ]

Committee for Scientific and Technical Information and Documentation | Scientific and Technical Information and Documentation Committee | CIDST [Abbr.] | CSTID [Abbr.] | STIDC [Abbr.]

information retrieval system | IRS | IR system | information selection system | document retrieval system | DRS

Arab Gulf States Information and Documentation Centre [ AGSIDC | Gulf States Information and Documentation Centre ]

informatics | information and documentation science

...MENT No . // Appendix to information document // INFORMATION ON TEST CONDITIONS // Appendix 4 // MODEL OF EC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE // (Maximum format: A4 (210 × 297 mm)) // Addendum to EC type-approval certificate No . // concerning the type-approval of a vehicle with regard to emissions and access to vehicle repair and maintenance information according to Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 // Appendix 5 // Vehicle OBD information // Appendix 6 // EC Type –Approval Certification Numbering System // Appendix 7 // IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY // IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY CHECK // STATISTICAL PROCEDURE FOR IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY TESTING // RESPONSIBILI ...[+++]TIES FOR IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY // VERIFYING AVERAGE EXHAUST EMISSIONS AT AMBIENT CONDITIONS // (TYPE 1 TEST) // EMISSIONS DATA REQUIRED AT TYPE-APPROVAL FOR ROADWORTHINESS PURPOSES // MEASURING CARBON MONOXIDE EMISSION AT IDLING SPEEDS // (TYPE 2 TEST) // MEASUREMENT OF SMOKE OPACITY // VERIFYING EMISSIONS OF CRANKCASE GASES // (TYPE 3 TEST) // DETERMINATION OF EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS // (TYPE 4 TEST) // VERIFYING THE DURABILITY OF POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES // (TYPE 5 TEST) // Standard Bench Cycle (SBC) // Standard Diesel Bench Cycle (SDBC) // Standard Road Cycle (SRC) // VERIFYING THE AVERAGE EMISSIONS AT LOW AMBIENT TEMPERATURES // (TYPE 6 TEST) // SPECIFICATIONS OF REFERENCE FUELS // EMISSIONS TEST PROCEDURE FOR HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES (HEV) // ON-BOARD DIAGNOSTICS (OBD) FOR MOTOR VEHICLES // FUNCTIONAL ASPECTS OF ON-BOARD DIAGNOSTIC (OBD) SYSTEMS // ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE VEHICLE FAMILY // DETERMINATION OF CO - EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION // EC TYPE-APPROVAL OF REPLACEMENT POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES AS SEPARATE TECHNICAL UNIT // Information document No . // relating to the EC type-approval of replacement pollution control devices // MODEL EC TYPE-APPROVAL CERTIFICATE // (Maximum format: A4 (210 mm × 297 mm)) // Example of the EC type-approval marks // Access to vehicle OBD and vehicle repair and maintenance information // IN-SERVICE CONFORMITY OF VEHICLES TYPE-APPROVED UNDER DIRECTIVE 70/220/EEC // In-service conformity check // Statistical procedure for in-service conformity testing // REQUIREMENTS FOR VEHICLES THAT USE A REAGENT FOR THE EXHAUST AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEM // AMENDMENTS TO REGULATION (EC) No 715/2007 ...

Regrets that it is still difficult for citizens to gain access to information held by EU institutions, the reason being that there is no common approach among the institutions geared to facilitate access to documents for citizens and based on complete transparency, communication and direct democracy; urges the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to develop further a more proactive approach on transparency by proactively disclosing as many of their documents as possible, in the most simple, user-friendly and accessible way, ...[+++]by having documents translated upon request into other EU official languages, and by establishing proper, simple and inexpensive information access arrangements, including by digital and electronic means, allowing for the needs of people with disabilities; considers, in particular, that the accessibility of information should be improved on by means of easy-to-use interfaces and search systems; calls for the development of a common access point to the portals of the three institutions, building on the pilot project for the online platform for the proactive publication of EU institutions documents, and for harmonising search portals between departments of the same institution (including Directorates-General in the Commission); calls, as well, on the institutions to continue and strengthen the work of expanding knowledge of EU legislation and policies; believes that, to that end, the EU should make full use of the potential offered by new technologies (social networks, smartphone applications, etc.) in order to ensure complete and easy access to information.

Points out that, while trilogues are important and effective, the procedures currently applicable to them give rise to concerns as regards the openness in the legislative procedure; calls on the institutions involved to ensure greater transparency of informal trilogues to strengthen democracy by allowing citizens to scrutinise the relevant information which has formed the basis of a legislative act, as stated by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the joined cases Sweden and Turco v Council, while ensuring adequate space to think for the co-legislators; calls on the EU institutions to increase reporting in the competent parli ...[+++]amentary committee on the state of play of trilogue negotiations; considers that where documents are created in the framework of trilogues, such as agendas, summaries of outcomes, minutes and general approaches in the Council, as available, such documents are related to legislative procedures and cannot, in principle, be treated differently from other legislative documents; takes the view that a list of trilogue meetings, and of such aforementioned documents, should be made directly accessible on Parliament’s website; recalls that the future interinstitutional agreement on better law-making includes a database on legislative files and, if adopted, would also address the appropriate handling of trilogues.

Whereas the Ombudsman, who may also act on his own initiative, must have access to all the elements required for the performance of his duties; whereas to that end Community institutions and bodies are obliged to supply the Ombudsman, at his request, with any information which he requests of them and without prejudice to the Ombudsman's obligation not to divulge such information; whereas access to classified information or documents, in particular to sensitive documents within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 ...[+++] , should be subject to compliance with the rules on security of the Community institution or body concerned; whereas the institutions or bodies supplying classified information or documents as mentioned in the first subparagraph of Article 3(2) should inform the Ombudsman of such classification; whereas for the implementation of the rules provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 3(2), the Ombudsman should have agreed in advance with the institution or body concerned the conditions for treatment of classified information or documents and other information covered by the obligation of professional secrecy; whereas if the Ombudsman finds that the assistance requested is not forthcoming, he shall inform the European Parliament, which shall make appropriate representations;