full risk assessment

all risks insurance | full insurance | insurance against all risks

full-risk

financial risk [ credit risk | default risk | exchange risk | foreign exchange rate risk | interest rate risk | liquidity risk | loan risk | macroprudential risk | market risk | sovereign risk | systematic risk | systemic risk ]

full-time employment [ full-time | full-time job | full-time work | permanent employment | steady job | Full time(ECLAS) ]

risk management [ enterprise risk management | ERM | risk analysis | risk assessment | risk assessment(UNBIS) ]

full face method [ full face driving | full-face method | full-face method of advance | full face attack | full face | full-face attack ]

full-time four-wheel drive system | full-time four wheel drive system | full-time 4WD system | full time four wheel drive | full-time four wheel drive | full-time four-wheel drive | F4WD | full time 4WD | permanent four-wheel drive

substandard risk [ impaired risk | under average risk | abnormal risk | impaired life | increased risk | substandard life | under average life | bad risk | aggravated risk ]

audit risk [ overall audit risk | ultimate audit risk | absolute risk | overall risk | ultimate risk | joint risk ]

(Return tabled) Question No. 1320 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With regard to ongoing investigation into habitat conservation in Canada, and particularly the proposed National Conservation Plan: (a) what research, including all studies, findings and recommendations, and investment has the government undertaken to assess the full potential of the Species at Risk Act (SARA), in its current form, to contribute to national habitat conservation objectives; and (b) what research, including all studies, findings and recommendations, has the government undertaken to asses ...[+++]s what will be required to ensure that the full potential of SARA to contribute to national habitat conservation objectives is realized?

Mr. Speaker, I know my hon. colleague is doing her best to find something to complain about with regard to the environmental chapters in the budget but the fact is that we renewed full funding to protect species at risk. We renewed full funding for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act.

Question No. 140 Ms. Kirsty Duncan: With respect to development of the oil sands, its impacts on the environment and surrounding communities, and the economic effects of these impacts: (a) what, if any, steps has the government taken to establish air emission limits or air quality standards to achieve the World Health Organization’s Air Quality Guidelines to protect air quality and human health; (b) what, if any, steps has the government’s sector-by-sector approach taken to regulate carbon emissions in the oil sands to ensure the oil sands industry makes appropriate reductions in its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to contribute to Canada’s GHG emission reduction goal of 17% below the 2005 level; (c) what, if any, studies has the governmen ...[+++]t undertaken to examine the effect of the oil sands expansion on (i) GHG emissions, (ii) Canada’s ability to meet its GHG emission reduction goals, (iii) Canada’s contribution to the goal of staying below a 2°C increase in global average surface temperature, relative to the pre-industrial level, as articulated at the G8 meeting in L’Aquila, Italy and at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations through the Copenhagen Accord in December 2009 and the Cancun Agreements in December 2010, (iv) the full suite of sustainability criteria, including environmental, economic and social sustainability, and (v) what were the results of any studies identified in (c)(i), (c)(ii), (c)(iii), and (c)(iv); (d) what, if any, studies has the government undertaken to examine (i) the scope of oil sands expansion if the oil sands sector is not required to deliver its proportional share of GHG reductions, (ii) the impacts such a decision would have on other sectors’ allowable GHG emissions, (iii) whether other sectors of the Canadian economy would have to do more than their proportional share to reduce emissions, (iv) what were the results of any studies identified in (d)(i), (d)(ii), and (d)(iii); (e) what, if any, studies ...

Yes, it's truly a risk assessment, and a full risk assessment would be required to determine what an acceptable level of risk would be.